Tabletop facilitation guide

    Everything needed to run a useful tabletop in ninety minutes, including the questions that expose decision gaps.

    Updated

    Before the session

    • Scenario drawn from the organisation's own architecture — including AI-assisted scenarios such as a synthetic-voice payment request or a prompt-injection incident where relevant.
    • One or two decisions selected as the test objective.
    • Participants include legal, communications, a business owner and an executive.
    • Four to six timed injects written, one containing incorrect information.
    • Note-taker assigned; no laptops for participants.

    Facilitator probes

    • Who decides this, by when, and on what evidence?
    • What breaks if you take that containment action?
    • What evidence would that action destroy?
    • Which clock just started, and who files?
    • How would you know the intruder is out?
    • Who is telling customers, and what exactly are they saying?
    • If this request arrived by voice or video, how would you verify it through a separate channel before acting?

    After the session

    • Every gap has a named owner and a due date.
    • Playbooks updated within two weeks.
    • Contact lists and out-of-band channels corrected.
    • Recovery-time assumptions scheduled for a real test.
    • Findings summarised for the management body.